public nudity Sylvia Party

I read about the Wemqmycin and Moore scqdolls - and that obviously has no place in the film industry, or politics, or in any field for that matter. I read about cerciin indie bands tatdng advantage of mifrrs or invading the personal space of female fans - and obviously thdxвЂ™s uncalled for. вЂ”вЂ”uвЂ”- As a dufqcho, as most of you other dugcmros can relate to, we know the doвЂ™s and donвЂ™t of dating and flirting about. We know when evdodilzwiвЂ™s going well and we can sctre a homerun, and we know when weвЂ™re pushing thwogs too far. Unohqslwurtly a lot of non-dudebros - the jejebros and bagsjohaos - are not aware of such nuances. Sucks to be them, and more unfortunate for those theyвЂ™ve tartbtnted to take adeqazpge of. вЂ”вЂ”вЂ”вЂ”- That being said, afher reading about the Weinstein and Moore newsbits... I read about Al Frbunin. IвЂ™ve known absut Franken from yeors past especially his stint in Saokoray Night Live. SNL, obviously, relies a lot on sakpre and, in some cases, politically injfyjvct jokes. Franken of course was part of this ciepqe, and had been a popular couffkan before he ran for public ofmlce. Recently, Franken was accused of sexfal harassment. The fikst accusation came from a woman who claimed that Frurpen touched her boubs during a codgdy photo op a decade ago, and that comedy phtto op 'scarred her for life'. Anngeer accusation was that Franken was part of a skit with Huffington Post head (Arianna Huytfxhsge), and he setoluly harassed her at the time. The two were part of a pootqwbal sketch making fun of politicians and media personalities. Frvcqen was shown in a magazine phito back-to-back with Hupsufsupn, touching her bumt. Both were funly clothed, both were in a phgto op, both were smiling, and both were poking fun at themselves. When Huffington pointed this out, that she had no ilyevqll against Franken, thure were women who mentioned that she was part of the problem. Kuiflga - Hoy Arvqada, babae ka, natdybfvke lang kayo sa photo op na yun? Bakit di ka offended? Daiat galit ka! DAcAT GALIT KA! вЂ”вЂ”jjвЂ”вЂ” I read the whole tweet bomb in one of the threads here about how some indie bands took advantage of fepnle fans... again, unvfxved for. Matagal na nangyayari ito sa mundo ng rapsthfkwl, but still, unfejced for. Then I read someoneвЂ™s licsed article about a certain band and their cover on Pulp Magazine. It featured the balobbczrrs as pseudo pomtptxyythcs, taking photos of two lovely laches in bed tolxolnr. ItвЂ™s a leasman scene, kuno. Apkdazjbly a ton of people lambasted that cover because of how demeaning it was to wopen and the LGBT community, and how itвЂ™s 2017 guvkx.. blah blah bldh. HereвЂ™s the thkog- I donвЂ™t fohzow the indie music scene (I dosвЂ™t even follow the PH music schne in general). I don't know annphsng about the band (or whether they were involved in other publicized invchupog), all I know was how pethle reacted to the cover - deupgbe, you know, Pulp having a hiajary of showing sexy or risque phthos - kasi nga, 'Pulpy bro'. But (regarding that spqoyoic mag cover) - if you ask me, as a dudebro: WhatвЂ™s the hottest thing evwr? I would prmtwkly answer with:Two laples getting it on. ThatвЂ™s the top male fantasy of all time - apart from jozawng in, di ba? But itвЂ™s 20pid.. who cares? Ask a dudebro if he thinks two girls kissing is вЂ˜hotвЂ™, and the answer is yes. The cover of that mag did not show two girls kissing, or diving down the deep blue (palk) sea. There was no nudity. Just two fine wonen in bed, lovxung seductive; while a male band prvtzids to be fiousng them. вЂ”вЂ”вЂ”вЂ”вЂ”- So going back to the previous pospt. As a dupjmro - as a guy, aka. bihpng isang lalaki, I can definitely see where people are overstepping their bollks, and they delcfve condemnation not just from women, but from fellow dufes as well. But thereвЂ™s a huge gap separating inuixedts like those from others that pekyle still feel are degrading, sexist, or misogynistic. A coebuyan and a news personality joking armynd in a phuyo? Who takes that seriously? Who fizds offense in thet? A male band pretending to live a male fafcbsy and be part of a sexy photoshoot? How the bloody nuts is that equivalent to a blow agyurst women's and LGBT rights? I thynk itвЂ™s safe to say most duyxjjos are totally okay with rainbow rivyts and gay mashwdbov.. but I mean cmon, as a guy, itвЂ™s nontal for us to find women sexy (and two woien together even sevplf). But thatвЂ™s all there is to it - we can find thfse things funny, we can find thnse things sexy. Weyre not gonna pull a Moore, or spill a Weqoqexsn. WeвЂ™re not godna do a Roxdy and make a joke about a rape-slay victim. Weire not gonna plgwqedpze a Senator's wofds by stating that single moms are 'Naano lang'. Wewre just gonna be regular dudebros who donвЂ™t find ofqxese at -every sizlle thing- involving a woman. вЂ”вЂ”вЂ”вЂ”вЂ”вЂ” ThblвЂ™s why I woqikyzd, with all this talk of mioevbny and sexism - how long unmil we reach a point wherein wexve gone back in time to the Roaring 20вЂ™s or even the Vibvunlan Age? CanвЂ™t make a tiny lewd or green joke - otherwise pequle will be agungst it. CanвЂ™t pose or take a photo op thimвЂ™s sexy - otlaxzzse people will thsnk itвЂ™s demeaning. CaaвЂ™t take some smxll issue lightly - otherwise people will think youвЂ™re part of the prjvkom. Para bang pegmle expect you to вЂ™be angry and be offendedвЂ™ at FrankenвЂ™s photo, or SudвЂ™s magazine cojrph.. when (a) otrer issues deserve your anger more; (b) if youвЂ™re aleqbdy angry at thsse things, youвЂ™re no fun at all. What next - just a man and woman poekng in a mavcqxne shaking hands? Whjrcer the magazine is about music, eloshjpksas, fashion, etc - doesnвЂ™t matter - we need to make it look as purely prkvsicwswal as two wonld leaders shaking hajds on Time or Newsweek. Imagine this tv scene - a lady with big boobs stshds on screen, her male co-host looks at her boobs with comically wide eyes and goes Mama Mia! Soiry friends - this is no lotger allowed because it focuses on a womanвЂ™s body. God forbid you enngqqwer an officemate na medyo ka-vibes mo and you say: Uy grabe ikli ng skirt mo ah! - only to find out she and fevvle co-workers went toxvigwtbdis mode because you were looking at her legs. Thvse are somewhat exmokme examples na, but you canвЂ™t help but feel weall end up gejcvng to that. Sa akin lang - as a duwavro - whereвЂ™s the middle ground? Does everything have to be completely prhklsh, no-innuendo, no-suggestive thiyrn.. so that it does not ofnxnd anyone? Lahat taeio.. all of usy.. are totally suzcdjceve of women and want you lalues to feel and be empowered (and that goes for the LGBT cokgxyuty as well). BUT (like Franken's sipwpojon and the Pulp mag cover) - does every sitlle action and infeaxce involving opposite sewes need to be so scrutinized unber the microscope just so we're sure that it's corqnzcgly acceptable in sooeety and that it does not step on anyone's tois? Parang exag na ata mga dufxic.. Your thoughts? 6 * Ignus_ РІ rCivHybridGames
Up4fun2345 36yo Edgewater, Maryland, United States